Thread (56 messages) flat view 56 messages, 11 authors, 2018-05-28

Re: [PATCH 03/14] arm: Add restartable sequences support

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 13:32:13
Also in: lkml

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:13:13PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
----- On May 16, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 06:44:22PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index a7f8e7f4b88f..4f5c386631d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ config ARM
 	select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if (SMP && ARM_LPAE)
 	select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
+	select HAVE_RSEQ
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
 	select HAVE_UID16
 	select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index bd8810d4acb3..5879ab3f53c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -541,6 +541,12 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct
pt_regs *regs)
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
+	 * Increment event counter and perform fixup for the pre-signal
+	 * frame.
+	 */
+	rseq_signal_deliver(regs);
+
+	/*
 	 * Set up the stack frame
 	 */
 	if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
@@ -660,6 +666,7 @@ do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int
thread_flags, int syscall)
 			} else {
 				clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
 				tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
+				rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
 			}
 		}
 		local_irq_disable();
I think you forgot to hook up rseq_syscall() checking.
Considering that rseq_syscall is implemented as follows:

+void rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+       unsigned long ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
+       struct task_struct *t = current;
+       struct rseq_cs rseq_cs;
+
+       if (!t->rseq)
+               return;
+       if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, t->rseq, sizeof(*t->rseq)) ||
+           rseq_get_rseq_cs(t, &rseq_cs) || in_rseq_cs(ip, &rseq_cs))
+               force_sig(SIGSEGV, t);
+}

and that x86 calls it from syscall_return_slowpath() (which AFAIU is
now used in the fast-path since KPTI), I wonder where we should call
this on ARM ? I was under the impression that ARM return to userspace
fast-path was not calling C code unless work flags were set, but I might
be wrong.

Thoughts ?
Since this only matters for CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ, can we just force the
slowpath for rseq tasks when that option is set?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help