Re: [PATCH 10/32] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-05-20 07:34:46
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, netdev
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:32:25AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
quoted
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&aiocb->ki_list, &ctx->delayed_cancel_reqs); + spin_unlock(&ctx->ctx_lock);... and io_cancel(2) comes, finds it and inhume^Wcompletes it, leaving us to...quoted
+ spin_lock(&req->head->lock);... get buggered on attempt to dereference a pointer fetched from freed and reused object.
FWIW, how painful would it be to pull the following trick: * insert into wait queue under ->ctx_lock * have wakeup do schedule_work() with aio_complete() done from that * have ->ki_cancel() grab queue lock, remove from queue and use the same schedule_work() That way you'd get ->ki_cancel() with the same semantics as originally for everything - "ask politely to finish ASAP", and called in the same locking environment for everyone - under ->ctx_lock, that is. queue lock nests inside ->ctx_lock; no magical flags, etc. The cost is schedule_work() for each async poll-related completion as you have for fsync. I don't know whether that's too costly or not; it certainly simplifies the things, but whether it's OK performance-wise... Comments? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>