Re: [PATCH 05/32] fs: introduce new ->get_poll_head and ->poll_mask methods
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-04-06 04:58:33
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, netdev
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-04-06 04:58:33
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, netdev
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+ get_poll_head: Returns the struct wait_queue_head that poll, select, + epoll or aio poll should wait on in case this instance only has single + waitqueue. Can return NULL to indicate polling is not supported, + or a POLL* value using the POLL_TO_PTR helper in case a grave error + occured and ->poll_mask shall not be called.
+ if (IS_ERR(head)) + return PTR_TO_POLL(head);
+ * ->get_poll_head can return a __poll_t in the PTR_ERR, use these macros + * to return the value and recover it. It takes care of the negation as + * well as off the annotations. + */ +#define POLL_TO_PTR(mask) (ERR_PTR(-(__force int)(mask)))
Uh-oh...
static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
{
return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
}
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((unsigned long)(void *)(x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
#define MAX_ERRNO 4095
IOW, your trick relies upon arguments of PTR_TO_POLL being no greater
than 4095. Now, consider
#define EPOLLRDHUP (__force __poll_t)0x00002000
which is to say, 8192...
So anything that tries e.g. POLL_TO_PTR(EPOLLRDHUP | EPOLLERR) will be in
for a quiet unpleasant surprise...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>