Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 2 authors, 2018-04-06

Re: [PATCH 05/32] fs: introduce new ->get_poll_head and ->poll_mask methods

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-04-06 04:58:33
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml, netdev

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+  get_poll_head: Returns the struct wait_queue_head that poll, select,
+  epoll or aio poll should wait on in case this instance only has single
+  waitqueue.  Can return NULL to indicate polling is not supported,
+  or a POLL* value using the POLL_TO_PTR helper in case a grave error
+  occured and ->poll_mask shall not be called.
+		if (IS_ERR(head))
+			return PTR_TO_POLL(head);
+ * ->get_poll_head can return a __poll_t in the PTR_ERR, use these macros
+ * to return the value and recover it.  It takes care of the negation as
+ * well as off the annotations.
+ */
+#define POLL_TO_PTR(mask)	(ERR_PTR(-(__force int)(mask)))
Uh-oh...
static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
{
        return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
}
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((unsigned long)(void *)(x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
#define MAX_ERRNO       4095

IOW, your trick relies upon arguments of PTR_TO_POLL being no greater
than 4095.  Now, consider
#define EPOLLRDHUP      (__force __poll_t)0x00002000
which is to say, 8192...

So anything that tries e.g. POLL_TO_PTR(EPOLLRDHUP | EPOLLERR) will be in
for a quiet unpleasant surprise...

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help