Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2018-04-06

Re: io_pgetevents & aio fsync V2

From: Jeff Moyer <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-06 12:58:00
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:16:30AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
quoted
BTW, this is only tangentially related, but... does *anything* call
io_submit() for huge amounts of iocb?
I don't know.  If an application did that, as many I/Os as could fit
into the ring buffer would be submitted, and that's what gets returned
from the system call (the number of submitted iocbs).
quoted
Check in do_io_submit() is insane - "no more than MAX_LONG total of
_pointers_".  Compat variant goes for "no more than a page worth of
pointers" and there's a hard limit in ioctx_alloc() - we can't ever
get more than 8M slots in ring buffer...
Logical upper bound for io_submit is nr_events passed to io_setup(),
which is bound by aio_max_nr.  Except that we never actually check
against nr_events (or max_reqs as it is known in kernel) in io_submit.
Sigh..
io_submit_one calls aio_get_req which calls get_reqs_available, which is
what does the checking for an available ring buffer entry.

-Jeff

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help