On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:17:14PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Wu Hao [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:10:28PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Hao,

quoted

From: Xiao Guangrong <redacted>

User Accelerated Function Unit sub feature exposes the MMIO region of

Is it 'user accelerated'?  I think it is the Accelerator interface.

Hi Alan,

This is only used to emphasize this is the interface to accelerator
exposed to user. But looks like this causes some confusions for user
actually from the description. I agree with you, that I will remove
this UAFU from this patchset.

quoted

quoted

the AFU. After valid green bitstream (GBS) is programmed and port is

Would it make sense to just use "partial bitstream" or "PR bitstream"
and "static bitstream" for this patchset?  I don't think that adding
this terminology makes things clearer.  In any case when someone else
uses this patchset, they may not be using this type of branding in
their terminology.

Sure, will update the commit message and also sysfs doc below.

Yes and dfl.txt and the rest of the patchset as well, please.

Sure, I understand that it may have different PR hardwares under this
framework, each PR hardware may have a different terminology for its own
bitstream. We should use common terminology in the common doc and code
to avoid confusion. Thanks for the reminder. I will fix this.

Thanks
Hao

Alan