Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe

[PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-01-09
[PATCH v5 1/4] fs/splice: introduce pages_to_pipe helper · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-01-09
[PATCH v5 2/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-01-09
[PATCH v5 3/4] x86: wire up the process_vmsplice syscall · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-01-09
Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86: wire up the process_vmsplice syscall · kbuild test robot <hidden> · 2018-01-11
[PATCH v5 4/4] test: add a test for the process_vmsplice syscall · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-01-09
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2018-02-21
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> · 2018-02-26
Re: [OMPI devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Nathan Hjelm <hidden> · 2018-02-26
Re: [OMPI devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Mike Rapoport <hidden> · 2018-02-27
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Dmitry V. Levin <hidden> · 2018-02-27
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Andrei Vagin <hidden> · 2018-02-28
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Pavel Emelyanov <hidden> · 2018-02-28
Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Andrei Vagin <hidden> · 2018-02-28
Re: [OMPI devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe · Atchley, Scott <hidden> · 2018-02-28

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2018-02-21 00:44:06
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml

On Tue,  9 Jan 2018 08:30:49 +0200 Mike Rapoport [off-list ref] wrote:

This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.

All seems fairly strightforward.  The big question is: do we know that
people will actually use this, and get sufficient value from it to
justify its addition?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help