Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 3 authors, 2018-02-12

Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.16 02/21] rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call (v12)

flat view

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-14 19:49:57
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:50:13PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
Ultimately I wish fast increments like done by this_cpu_inc() could be
implemented in an efficient way on non x86 platforms that do not have
cheap instructions like that.
So the problem isn't migration; for that we could wrap the operation in
preempt_disable() which is not more expensive than rseq would be. And a
lot more deterministic.

The problem instead is interrupts, which can result in nested load-store
operations, and that comes apart. This then means having to disable
interrupts over these things and _that_ is expensive.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help