Thread (66 messages) flat view 66 messages, 8 authors, 2017-11-24

Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v3 15/22] rseq: selftests: Provide self-tests

From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-11-21 17:41:26
Also in: linux-kselftest, lkml

On 11/21/2017 10:05 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
----- On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:34 AM, shuah shuah@kernel.org wrote:

[...]
quoted
quoted
---
 MAINTAINERS                                        |    1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/Makefile                   |    1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/.gitignore            |    4 +
Thanks for the .gitignore files. It is commonly missed change, I end
up adding one to clean things up after tests get in.
I'm used to receive patches where contributors forget to add new files
to gitignore within my own projects, which may contribute to my awareness
of this pain point. :)

[...]
quoted
quoted
+
+void *test_percpu_inc_thread(void *arg)
+{
+	struct inc_thread_test_data *thread_data = arg;
+	struct inc_test_data *data = thread_data->data;
+	long long i, reps;
+
+	if (!opt_disable_rseq && thread_data->reg
+			&& rseq_register_current_thread())
+		abort();
+	reps = thread_data->reps;
+	for (i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
+		int cpu, ret;
+
+#ifndef SKIP_FASTPATH
+		/* Try fast path. */
+		cpu = rseq_cpu_start();
+		ret = rseq_addv(&data->c[cpu].count, 1, cpu);
+		if (likely(!ret))
+			goto next;
+#endif
So the test needs to compiled with this enabled? I think it would be better
to make this an argument to be abel to select at test start time as opposed
to making this compile time option. Remember that these tests get run in
automated test rings. Making this a compile time otpion pertty much ensures
that this path will not be tested.

So I would reccommend adding a paratemer.
quoted
+	slowpath:
+		__attribute__((unused));
+		for (;;) {
+			/* Fallback on cpu_opv system call. */
+			cpu = rseq_current_cpu();
+			ret = cpu_op_addv(&data->c[cpu].count, 1, cpu);
+			if (likely(!ret))
+				break;
+			assert(ret >= 0 || errno == EAGAIN);
+		}
+	next:
+		__attribute__((unused));
+#ifndef BENCHMARK
+		if (i != 0 && !(i % (reps / 10)))
+			printf_verbose("tid %d: count %lld\n", (int) gettid(), i);
+#endif
Same comment as before. Avoid compile time options.
The goal of those compiler define are to generate the altered code without
adding branches into the fast-paths.
That makes sense. You are looking to not add any overhead.
Here is an alternative solution that should take care of your concern: I'll
build multiple targets for param_test.c:

param_test
param_test_skip_fastpath (built with -DSKIP_FASTPATH)
param_test_benchmark (build with -DBENCHMARK)

I'll update run_param_test.sh to run both param_test and param_test_skip_fastpath.

Note that "param_test_benchmark" is only useful for benchmarking,
so I don't plan to run it from run_param_test.sh which is meant
to track regressions.

Is that approach OK with you ?
Yes. This approach addresses my concern about coverage for both paths.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help