Thread (65 messages) flat view 65 messages, 11 authors, 2017-10-24

Re: [RFC] mmap(MAP_CONTIG)

From: Guy Shattah <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-05 08:58:33
Also in: linux-mm

I'm on vacation and having technical difficulties uploading the slides. I'll upload them once I'm back.

Sorry

Guy

Outlook ???? Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 10:06:49 AM
To: Mike Kravetz; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski; Michal Nazarewicz; Aneesh Kumar K.V; Joonsoo Kim; Guy Shattah; Christoph Lameter
Subject: Re: [RFC] mmap(MAP_CONTIG)

On 10/04/2017 01:56 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:

Hi,
At Plumbers this year, Guy Shattah and Christoph Lameter gave a presentation
titled 'User space contiguous memory allocation for DMA' [1].  The slides
Hm I didn't find slides on that link, are they available?
point out the performance benefits of devices that can take advantage of
larger physically contiguous areas.

When such physically contiguous allocations are done today, they are done
within drivers themselves in an ad-hoc manner.
As Michal N. noted, the drivers might have different requirements. Is
contiguity (without extra requirements) so common that it would benefit
from a userspace API change?
Also how are the driver-specific allocations done today? mmap() on the
driver's device? Maybe we could provide some in-kernel API/library to
make them less "ad-hoc". Conversion to MAP_ANONYMOUS would at first seem
like an improvement in that userspace would be able to use a generic
allocation API and all the generic treatment of anonymous pages (LRU
aging, reclaim, migration etc), but the restrictions you listed below
eliminate most of that?
(It's likely that I just don't have enough info about how it works today
so it's difficult to judge)
In addition to allocations
for DMA, allocations of this type are also performed for buffers used by
coprocessors and other acceleration engines.

As mentioned in the presentation, posix specifies an interface to obtain
physically contiguous memory.  This is via typed memory objects as described
in the posix_typed_mem_open() man page.  Since Linux today does not follow
the posix typed memory object model, adding infrastructure for contiguous
memory allocations seems to be overkill.  Instead, a proposal was suggested
to add support via a mmap flag: MAP_CONTIG.

mmap(MAP_CONTIG) would have the following semantics:
- The entire mapping (length size) would be backed by physically contiguous
  pages.
- If 'length' physically contiguous pages can not be allocated, then mmap
  will fail.
- MAP_CONTIG only works with MAP_ANONYMOUS mappings.
- MAP_CONTIG will lock the associated pages in memory.  As such, the same
  privileges and limits that apply to mlock will also apply to MAP_CONTIG.
- A MAP_CONTIG mapping can not be expanded.
- At fork time, private MAP_CONTIG mappings will be converted to regular
  (non-MAP_CONTIG) mapping in the child.  As such a COW fault in the child
  will not require a contiguous allocation.

Some implementation considerations:
- alloc_contig_range() or similar will be used for allocations larger
  than MAX_ORDER.
- MAP_CONTIG should imply MAP_POPULATE.  At mmap time, all pages for the
  mapping must be 'pre-allocated', and they can only be used for the mapping,
  so it makes sense to 'fault in' all pages.
- Using 'pre-allocated' pages in the fault paths may be intrusive.
- We need to keep keep track of those pre-allocated pages until the vma is
  tore down, especially if free_contig_range() must be called.

Thoughts?
- Is such an interface useful?
- Any other ideas on how to achieve the same functionality?
- Any thoughts on implementation?

I have started down the path of pre-allocating contiguous pages at mmap
time and hanging those off the vma(vm_private_data) with some kludges to
use the pages at fault time.  It is really ugly, which is why I am not
sharing the code.  Hoping for some comments/suggestions.

[1] https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linuxplumbersconf.org%2F2017%2Focw%2Fproposals%2F4669&data=02%7C01%7Csguy%40mellanox.com%7Ca0ee0fe4f0f74074b69b08d50bbfa7d5%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636427840155156528&sdata=GYlJ926fwQKSUIKbP7AVI01dasvK%2F0JEWLS%2FoNwJbyU%3D&reserved=0
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help