Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pidmap(2)
From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-24 21:27:24
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexey Dobriyan [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Tatsiana Brouka <redacted>
Implement system call for bulk retrieveing of pids in binary form.
Using /proc is slower than necessary: 3 syscalls + another 3 for each thread +
converting with atoi() + instantiating dentries and inodes.
/proc may be not mounted especially in containers. Natural extension of
hidepid=2 efforts is to not mount /proc at all.
It could be used by programs like ps, top or CRIU. Speed increase will
become more drastic once combined with bulk retrieval of process statistics.
Benchmark:
N=1<<16 times
~130 processes (~250 task_structs) on a regular desktop system
opendir + readdir + closedir /proc + the same for every /proc/$PID/task
(roughly what htop(1) does) vs pidmap
/proc 16.80 ± 0.73%
pidmap 0.06 ± 0.31%
PIDMAP_* flags are modelled after /proc/task_diag patchset.
PIDMAP(2) Linux Programmer's Manual PIDMAP(2)
NAME
pidmap - get allocated PIDs
SYNOPSIS
long pidmap(pid_t pid, int *pids, unsigned int count , unsigned int start, int flags);I think we will seriously regret a syscall that does this. Djalal is working on fixing the turd that is hidepid, and this syscall is basically incompatible with ever fixing hidepids. I think that, to make it less regrettable, it needs to take an fd to a proc mount as a parameter. This makes me wonder why it's a syscall at all -- why not just create a new file like /proc/pids? --Andy