Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-09-26

Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] audit: Record fanotify access control decisions

flat view

From: Amir Goldstein <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-26 04:16:37
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Steve Grubb [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello,

The fanotify interface allows user space daemons to make access
control decisions. Under common criteria requirements, we need to
optionally record decisions based on policy. This patch adds a bit mask,
FAN_AUDIT, that a user space daemon can 'or' into the response decision
which will tell the kernel that it made a decision and record it.

It would be used something like this in user space code:

  response.response = FAN_DENY | FAN_AUDIT;
  write(fd, &response, sizeof(struct fanotify_response));

When the syscall ends, the audit system will record the decision as a
AUDIT_FANOTIFY auxiliary record to denote that the reason this event
occurred is the result of an access control decision from fanotify
rather than DAC or MAC policy.

A sample event looks like this:

type=PATH msg=audit(1504310584.332:290): item=0 name="./evil-ls"
inode=1319561 dev=fc:03 mode=0100755 ouid=1000 ogid=1000 rdev=00:00
obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 nametype=NORMAL
type=CWD msg=audit(1504310584.332:290): cwd="/home/sgrubb"
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1504310584.332:290): arch=c000003e syscall=2
success=no exit=-1 a0=32cb3fca90 a1=0 a2=43 a3=8 items=1 ppid=901
pid=959 auid=1000 uid=1000 gid=1000 euid=1000 suid=1000
fsuid=1000 egid=1000 sgid=1000 fsgid=1000 tty=pts1 ses=3 comm="bash"
exe="/usr/bin/bash" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:
s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
type=FANOTIFY msg=audit(1504310584.332:290): resp=2

Prior to using the audit flag, the developer needs to call
fanotify_init or'ing in FAN_ENABLE_AUDIT to ensure that the kernel
supports auditing. The calling process must also have the CAP_AUDIT_WRITE
capability.

Signed-off-by: sgrubb <redacted>
conditional on fixing the 2 nits below:
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <redacted>

...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index 907a481..3f6b509 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int process_access_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
         * userspace can send a valid response or we will clean it up after the
         * timeout
         */
-       switch (response) {
+       switch (response & ~FAN_AUDIT) {
        case FAN_ALLOW:
        case FAN_DENY:
                break;
@@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ static int process_access_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
        if (fd < 0)
                return -EINVAL;

+       if ((response & FAN_AUDIT) && (group->fanotify_data.audit_enabled == 0))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
&& !group->fanotify_data.audit_enabled)

== 0 was not need when audit_enabled was int. now its pure evil.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
        event = dequeue_event(group, fd);
        if (!event)
                return -ENOENT;
@@ -721,7 +724,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fanotify_init, unsigned int, flags, unsigned int, event_f_flags)
        if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
                return -EPERM;

+#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
+       if (flags & ~(FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS | FAN_ENABLE_AUDIT))
+#else
        if (flags & ~FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS)
+#endif
                return -EINVAL;

        if (event_f_flags & ~FANOTIFY_INIT_ALL_EVENT_F_BITS)
@@ -805,6 +812,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fanotify_init, unsigned int, flags, unsigned int, event_f_flags)
                group->fanotify_data.max_marks = FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_MARKS;
        }

+#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
+       if (flags & FAN_ENABLE_AUDIT) {
+               fd = -EPERM;
+               if (!capable(CAP_AUDIT_WRITE))
+                       goto out_destroy_group;
+               group->fanotify_data.audit_enabled = true;
+       }
+#endif
+
ifdef is not needed here as FAN_ENABLE_AUDIT flag won't survive the EINVAL
test above.

Thanks,
Amir.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help