Re: [PATCH v06 12/36] x86 uapi asm/signal.h: use __kernel_size_t instead of size_t
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2017-08-07 14:30:49
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Mikko Rapeli [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes userspace compilation error: error: unknown type name ‘size_t’ Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <redacted> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> --- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h index 8264f47cf53e..74346db30758 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct sigaction { typedef struct sigaltstack { void __user *ss_sp; int ss_flags; - size_t ss_size; + __kernel_size_t ss_size; } stack_t;
In patch 14, you took a different approach based on an earlier comment
of mine, for the same structure. I think we should definitely take the same
approach for signal.h across all architectures, whichever we end up using.
Arnd