Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/mremap: add MREMAP_MIRROR flag for existing mirroring functionality
From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-09 07:32:18
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 07/07/2017 11:39 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 07/07/2017 10:45 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:29:52AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:quoted
On 07/07/2017 03:23 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:17:26AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:quoted
The mremap system call has the ability to 'mirror' parts of an existing mapping. To do so, it creates a new mapping that maps the same pages as the original mapping, just at a different virtual address. This functionality has existed since at least the 2.6 kernel. This patch simply adds a new flag to mremap which will make this functionality part of the API. It maintains backward compatibility with the existing way of requesting mirroring (old_size == 0). If this new MREMAP_MIRROR flag is specified, then new_size must equal old_size. In addition, the MREMAP_MAYMOVE flag must be specified.The patch breaks important invariant that anon page can be mapped into a process only once.Actually, the patch does not add any new functionality. It only provides a new interface to existing functionality. Is it not possible to have an anon page mapped twice into the same process via system V shared memory? shmget(anon), shmat(), shmat. Of course, those are shared rather than private anon pages.By anon pages I mean, private anon or file pages. These are subject to CoW.quoted
quoted
What is going to happen to mirrored after CoW for instance? In my opinion, it shouldn't be allowed for anon/private mappings at least. And with this limitation, I don't see much sense in the new interface -- just create mirror by mmap()ing the file again.The code today works for anon shared mappings. See simple program below. You are correct in that it makes little or no sense for private mappings. When looking closer at existing code, mremap() creates a new private mapping in this case. This is most likely a bug.IIRC, existing code doesn't create mirrors of private pages as it requires old_len to be zero. There's no way to get private pages mapped twice this way.Correct. As mentioned above, mremap does 'something' for private anon pages when old_len == 0. However, this may be considered a bug. In this case, mremap creates a new private anon mapping of length new_size. Since old_len == 0, it does not unmap any of the old mapping. So, in this case mremap basically creates a new private mapping (unrealted to the original) and does not modify the old mapping.
Yeah, in my experiment, after the mremap() exists we have two different VMAs which can contain two different set of data. No page sharing is happening. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>