Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: fix sending -ERESTARTSYS due to signal on fallback
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-09 01:10:43
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Martin Fuzzey [off-list ref] wrote:
On 07/06/17 19:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:quoted
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:28:38AM +0200, Fuzzey, Martin wrote:quoted
1) Android init calls write() on the sysfs file 2) The sysfs .store() callback registered by a driver is called 3) The driver calls request_firmware() 4) request_firmware() sends the firmware load request to userspace and calls wait_for_completion_interruptible()Martin, just for completeness on documenting on the commit log of the next swait proposed fix for this -- what signal did the process get from which you note the child dies below ? Exactly what in Android sent this signal ?Android didn't send the signal, the kernel did (SIGCHLD). Like this: 1) Android init (pid=1) fork()s (say pid=42) [this child process is totally unrelated to firmware loading] 2) Android init (pid=1) does a write() on a (driver custom) sysfs file which ends up calling request_firmware() kernel side 3) The firmware loading fallback mechanism is used, the request is sent to userspace and pid 1 waits in the kernel on wait_* 4) before firmware loading completes pid 42 dies (for any reason - in my case normal termination)
Interesting, could one interpretation here be that the process successfully finishing + the signal being sent beats out the timing of the firmware_class syfs code detecting that the write completed ?
5) Kernel delivers SIGCHLD to pid=1 to tell it a child has died, which causes -ERESTARTSYS to be returned from wait_*
Luis