Re: [PATCH] mm: introduce MADV_CLR_HUGEPAGE
From: Mike Rapoport <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-30 10:19:37
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 09:44:08AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 24-05-17 17:27:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:quoted
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:18:00PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
Why cannot khugepaged simply skip over all VMAs which have userfault regions registered? This would sound like a less error prone approach to me.khugepaged does skip over VMAs which have userfault. We could register the regions with userfault before populating them to avoid collapses in the transition period.Why cannot you register only post-copy regions and "manually" copy the pre-copy parts?
We can register only post-copy regions, but this will cause VMA fragmentation. Now we register the entire VMA with userfaultfd, no matter how many pages were dirtied there since the pre-dump. If we register only post-copy regions, we will split out the VMAs for those regions.
quoted
But then we'll have to populate these regions with UFFDIO_COPY which adds quite an overhead.How big is the performance impact?
I don't have the numbers handy, but for each post-copy range it means that instead of memcpy() we will use ioctl(UFFDIO_COPY).
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
-- Sincerely yours, Mike.