Re: memory hotplug and force_remove
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-03-30 08:48:58
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory hotremove (remove_memory): ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size - 1), NULL, check_memblock_offlined_cb); if (ret) BUG(); and it took a while to learn that the issue is caused by /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove being enabled. I was really surprised to see such an option because at least for the memory hotplug it cannot work at all. Memory hotplug fails when the memory is still in use. Even if we do not BUG() here enforcing the hotplug operation will lead to problematic behavior later like crash or a silent memory corruption if the memory gets onlined back and reused by somebody else. I am wondering what was the motivation for introducing this behavior and whether there is a way to disallow it for memory hotplug. Or maybe drop it completely. What would break in such a case?Honestly, I don't remember from the top of my head and I haven't looked at that code for several months. I need some time to recall that.Did you have any chance to look into this?Well, yes. It looks like that was added for some people who depended on the old behavior at that time. I guess we can try to drop it and see what happpens. :-)
I'd agree with that; at the same time, udev rule should be submitted to systemd folks though. I don't think there is anything existing in this area yet (neither do distros ship their own udev rules for this AFAIK). Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>