Re: [RFC, PATCHv2 29/29] mm, x86: introduce RLIMIT_VADDR
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-05 19:14:15
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On 12/26/2016 05:54 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
MM would use min(RLIMIT_VADDR, TASK_SIZE) as upper limit of virtual address available to map by userspace.
What happens to existing mappings above the limit when this upper limit is dropped? Similarly, why do we do with an application running with something incompatible with the larger address space that tries to raise the limit? Say, legacy MPX. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>