Re: [RFC v3 19/22] landlock: Add interrupted origin
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2016-09-14 18:29:55
Also in:
cgroups, lkml, netdev
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2016-09-14 18:29:55
Also in:
cgroups, lkml, netdev
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] wrote:
This third origin of hook call should cover all possible trigger paths (e.g. page fault). Landlock eBPF programs can then take decisions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> ---
+ if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {IMO security hooks have no business being called from interrupts. Aren't they all synchronous things done by tasks? Interrupts are driver things. Are you trying to check for page faults and such? --Andy