Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 8 authors, 2016-10-01

Re: Ping: [PATCH v15 00/13] support "task_isolation" mode

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-12 23:58:57
Also in: lkml

On Monday, September 12, 2016 11:15:45 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 12, 2016 06:14:44 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:01:58PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
quoted
On 9/7/2016 5:11 PM, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
quoted
When running only the test_jitter(), the isolation mode is lost:

    [ 6741.566048] isolation/9515: task_isolation mode lost due to irq_work

With ftrace (events/workqueue/workqueue_execute_start), I get a bit more info:

     kworker/1:1-676   [001] ....  6610.097128: workqueue_execute_start: work struct ffff8801a784ca20: function dbs_work_handler

The governor was ondemand, so I tried to set the frequency scaling
governor to performance, but that does not solve the issue. Is there
a way to suppress this irq_work? Should we run the isolated task with
high real-time priority, such that it never get preempted?
On the tile platform we don't have the frequency scaling stuff to contend with, so
I don't know much about it.  I'd be very curious to know what you can figure out
on this front.
Rafael, I'm thinking the performance governor should be able to run
without sending IPIs. Is there anything we can quickly do about that?
The performance governor doesn't do any IPIs.

At this point I'm not sure what's going on.
I've just tried and switching over to the performance governor makes
dbs_work_handler go away for me (w/ -rc4 with some extra irrelevant patches
on top) as it should.

What doesn't work, in particular?

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help