Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-22

Re: [PATCH 4/8] pipe: fix limit checking in pipe_set_size()

flat view

From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-21 21:15:31
Also in: lkml

On 08/21/2016 10:33 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 08/20/2016 01:17 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
quoted
On 08/20/2016 08:56 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
quoted
On 08/19/2016 08:30 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
quoted
Is there any reason why we couldn't do the (size > pipe_max_size) check
before calling account_pipe_buffers()?
No reason that I can see. Just a little more work to be done in the
code, I think.
And, just so I make sure we're understanding each other... I assume you
mean changing the code here to something like:
[...]
quoted
        if (nr_pages > pipe->buffers &&
                        size > pipe_max_size && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
                return -EPERM;

        user_bufs = account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->buffers, nr_pages);

        if (nr_pages > pipe->buffers &&
                        too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user_bufs ||
                        too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user_bufs)) &&
                        !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
                ret = -EPERM;
                goto out_revert_acct;
        }

Right?
Yup, that's what I had in mind.
Okay -- changed.
(The parantheses are messed up though.)
Yup, was just a quick untested edit to make sure we meant the same thing.

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help