On 07/09/2016 01:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
I.e. this pattern:
ret = pkey_mprotect(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, real_prot, pkey);
... would validate the pkey and we'd return -EOPNOTSUPP for pkey that is not
available? This would allow maximum future flexibility as it would not define
kernel allocated pkeys as a 'range'.
Isn't this multiplexing an otherwise straightforward system call? In
addition to providing pkey assignment to memory, it would also being
used to pass pkey allocation information independently from any use for
memory assignment.
The complexity of the ABI comes from its behavior, not from the raw
number of system calls that are needed to implement it. IOW, this makes
the ABI *more* complicated.