Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-07-19 04:48:24
Also in:
linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:quoted
This patch implements clone_file_range in f2fs.[...]quoted
+int f2fs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len) +{ + return f2fs_clone_files(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len); +} +Falling back from copy to clone should be done in the VFS. I look into implementing the fallback, and the code is trivial, but we don't seem to have any useful coverage for copy_file_range yet, so I didn't dare to add it yet. How did you test copy and clone in f2fs? And how did you handle the difference in corner cases (e.g. the lacking 0 special case in copy)?
Frankly speaking, I confused the behaviors without being aware of corner cases. And thus, I dropped the patches already. Instead, I realized that what I did was moving a range of blocks from one file to another file. So, I've been testing a new ioctl, F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. In terms of coverage, I just did some unit tests only. Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev