On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/30/2016 02:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted
* Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so
that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty
minor.
quoted
include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +-
include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 +
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +-
mm/mprotect.c | 134 +-
So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI
extensions.
That's a quite reasonable request, but I'm really surprised by it at
this point. The proposed ABI is one very straightforward extension to
one existing system call, plus four others that you personally suggested.
I apologize for the very late review, but (see other thread) I think
we may need to make sure we've defined the signal delivery semantics
in a useful way before enabling these. I'm not convinced that the
current behavior is helpful. This may or may not require any change
to the syscall signatures, but I can imagine that doing it right would
involve adding another syscall to *read* the current signal-delivery
state of a pkey or perhaps of all the pkeys. That could potentially
be achieved by adding an extra pointer parameter to pkey_get so
pkey_get can return both the current state and the state at next
signal delivery.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>