Re: [PATCH v5 39/50] mtd: nand: omap2: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops
From: Roger Quadros <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-19 10:31:14
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Subsystem:
memory technology devices (mtd), nand flash subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra, Linus Torvalds
On 18/04/16 18:05, Boris Brezillon wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:32:49 +0300 Roger Quadros [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Boris, On 30/03/16 19:14, Boris Brezillon wrote:quoted
Implementing the mtd_ooblayout_ops interface is the new way of exposing ECC/OOB layout to MTD users. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted> --- drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c index 4ebf16b..bca154a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ struct omap_nand_info { u_char *buf; int buf_len; struct gpmc_nand_regs reg; - /* generated at runtime depending on ECC algorithm and layout selected */ - struct nand_ecclayout oobinfo; /* fields specific for BCHx_HW ECC scheme */ struct device *elm_dev; struct device_node *of_node;@@ -1639,19 +1637,108 @@ static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info, return true; } +static int omap_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, + struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) +{ + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); + int off = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? + BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1;IMO "off = 1" is valid only for OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW and 8-bit NAND. For all other layouts it is always set to BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH.Indeed. [...]quoted
quoted
- /* all OOB bytes from oobfree->offset till end off OOB are free */ - ecclayout->oobfree->length = mtd->oobsize - ecclayout->oobfree->offset; /* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */ - if (mtd->oobsize < (ecclayout->eccbytes + BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH)) { + min_oobbytes = (oobbytes_per_step * + (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)) + + (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? + BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1);would it affect this as well?And here as well. I've generated a patch (see below) fixing those problems.quoted
quoted
+ if (mtd->oobsize < min_oobbytes) { dev_err(&info->pdev->dev, "not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n", - ecclayout->eccbytes, mtd->oobsize); + min_oobbytes, mtd->oobsize); err = -EINVAL; goto return_error; }I will need to test this change with all possible configurations. The number of configurations on OMAP is a bit overwhelming :(.Sorry about that, but at least now I have someone who can test it :). Thanks, Boris --->8---diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c index 9b96f56..07d4039 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c@@ -1640,9 +1640,13 @@ static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info, static int omap_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); - int off = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1; + struct omap_nand_info *info = mtd_to_omap(mtd); + struct nand_chip *chip = &info->nand; + int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; + + if (info->ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW && + !(chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)) + off = 1; if (section) return -ERANGE;@@ -1656,9 +1660,13 @@ static int omap_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, static int omap_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) { - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); - int off = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1; + struct omap_nand_info *info = mtd_to_omap(mtd); + struct nand_chip *chip = &info->nand; + int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; + + if (info->ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW && + !(chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)) + off = 1; if (section) return -ERANGE;@@ -1682,8 +1690,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) { struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); - int off = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1; + int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; if (section >= chip->ecc.steps) return -ERANGE;@@ -1702,8 +1709,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) { struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); - int off = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1; + int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; if (section) return -ERANGE;@@ -1737,7 +1743,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dma_cap_mask_t mask; unsigned sig; struct resource *res; - int min_oobbytes; + int min_oobbytes = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; int oobbytes_per_step; pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);@@ -1921,6 +1927,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) nand_chip->ecc.correct = omap_correct_data; mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &omap_ooblayout_ops); oobbytes_per_step = nand_chip->ecc.bytes; + + if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) + min_oobbytes = 1;
Shouldn't this have been if (!(nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) min_oobbytes = 1; ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
break; case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:@@ -2038,10 +2047,8 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* check if NAND device's OOB is enough to store ECC signatures */ - min_oobbytes = (oobbytes_per_step * - (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)) + - (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? - BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH : 1); + min_oobbytes += (oobbytes_per_step * + (mtd->writesize / nand_chip->ecc.size)); if (mtd->oobsize < min_oobbytes) { dev_err(&info->pdev->dev, "not enough OOB bytes required = %d, available=%d\n",
After the above changes BCH with HW ECC worked fine but BCH with SW ECC still failed. I had to fix it up with the below patch. This is mainly because chip->ecc.steps wasn't yet initialized before calling nand_bch_init(). After the below patch it worked fine with bch4 (hw & sw), bch8 (hw & sw) and ham1. I couldn't yet verify bch16 though. --cheers, -roger
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index db22c01..1b1a804 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; - if (section >= chip->ecc.steps) + if (section >= mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size) /* ecc steps */ return -ERANGE; /*
@@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH; - if (section) + if (section >= mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size) /* ecc steps */ return -ERANGE; /*
--
2.5.0