Hello, Serge.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:46:39PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
It's not a leak of any information we're trying to hide. I realize
something like 8 years have passed, but I still basically go by the
ksummit guidance that containers are ok but the kernel's first priority
is to facilitate containers but not trick containers into thinking
they're not containerized. So long as the container is properly set
up, I don't think there's anything the workload could do with the
nsroot= info other than *know* that it is in a ns cgroup.
If we did change that guidance, there's a slew of proc info that we
could better virtualize :)
I see. I'm just wondering because the information here seems a bit
gratuituous. Isn't the only thing necessary telling whether the root
is bind mounted or namescoped? Wouldn't simple "nsroot" work for that
purpose?
Thanks.
--
tejun