Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 5 authors, 2016-03-17

Re: [PATCH v15 1/3] drm: rockchip: Add basic drm driver

From: Tomeu Vizoso <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-17 13:50:20
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, lkml

On 16 March 2016 at 16:23, Tomeu Vizoso [off-list ref] wrote:
On 15 March 2016 at 02:30, Mark yao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 2016年03月14日 21:35, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
quoted
On 2 December 2014 at 10:15, Mark Yao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e7ca25b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1455 @@
...
quoted
+static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
+                               const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+                               struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+       if (adjusted_mode->htotal == 0 || adjusted_mode->vtotal == 0)
+               return false;
Hi Mark,

what's the rationale for this?

Disabling a CRTC as in [0] will cause mode_fixup() to be called with
an empty mode, failing that test.

Removing the check seems to get things working fine for a short while,
but a later modeset invariably gets the VOP to hang (as reported by
[1]).

Do you know why that check was put in place and what exactly could be
causing the hw to hang?

[0]
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/tree/lib/igt_kms.c#n1616
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c#n873

Thanks,

Tomeu
Hi Tomeu

Just thinking that "adjusted_mode->htotal == 0 || adjusted_mode->vtotal ==
0" is not a good mode for vop.
Ah, ok. Guess it should be removed then so we don't break userspace?
quoted
And you said VOP hang, only WARN_ON error message? or system hang, die?
Sorry, the symptom was only the warning, I just went a bit too far and
assumed the VOP had stopped working at all.
quoted
I think maybe crtc disable too fast, vblank is off, then no one can feed the
wait_update_complete.
Can you test it again with following patch?
Actually, in today's testing I don't see that happening any more,
sorry about that :/

What I have been looking at today is a related issue when running the
kms_flip_event_leak test from intel-gpu-tools. If I remove the check
mentioned above so CRTCs can be disabled with the SetCRTC IOCTL, I see
this page fault the second and subsequent times I run the test.

[   75.809031] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: Page fault at 0x01000000 of type read
[   75.809035] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: iova = 0x01000000: dte_index:
0x4 pte_index: 0x0 page_offset: 0x0
[   75.809040] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: mmu_dte_addr: 0x2c258000
dte@0x2c258010: 0x2c561001 valid: 1 pte@0x2c561000: 0x2a000006 valid:
0 page@0x00000000 flags: 0x0
[   76.951288] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: Enable stall request timed
out, status: 0x00004b

I have written a smaller standalone test that is attached in case you
want to check it out, but I haven't been able to find out why it only
happens when the test is rerun.

Apparently the VOP is still trying to read a BO (0x01000000) right
when the kernel frees it, but from what I can see, it should be
scanning another BO at that point.

Do you have any ideas on what could be happening?
Apparently, when the VOP is re-enabled, it will start scanning from
the framebuffer address that had been set last.

Because DMA addresses are recycled and there's going to be a low
number of framebuffers, this isn't going to be obvious unless we make
sure that there isn't a FB allocated at that DMA address any more.

The attached test case does just that.

Regards,

Tomeu
Thanks,

Tomeu
quoted
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
@@ -503,6 +503,8 @@ static void vop_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
        if (!vop->is_enabled)
                return;
 +       vop_crtc_wait_for_update(crtc);
+
        drm_crtc_vblank_off(crtc);
Thanks.

--
Mark Yao

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help