Re: [RFC v1 03/17] selftest/seccomp: Fix the flag name SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-24 04:35:40
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] wrote:
Rename SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC to SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC to match the UAPI. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <redacted> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <redacted> Cc: Will Drewry <redacted>
Hah, oops. Thanks! Shuah, can you take this patch into the selftest tree? Acked-by: Kees Cook <redacted> -Kees
quoted hunk
--- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index b9453b838162..9c1460f277c2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c@@ -1497,8 +1497,8 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped) #define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1 #endif -#ifndef SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC -#define SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC 1 +#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 #endif #ifndef seccomp@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ TEST(TSYNC_first) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &prog); ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");@@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_ancestor) self->sibling_count++; } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) { TH_LOG("Could install filter on all threads!");@@ -1892,7 +1892,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_no_filter) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence) self->sibling_count++; } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(self->sibling[0].system_tid, ret) { TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");@@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) TH_LOG("Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!"); } - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(ret, self->sibling[0].system_tid) { TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");@@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) /* Switch to the remaining sibling */ sib = !sib; - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) { TH_LOG("Expected the remaining sibling to sync");@@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0)) sleep(0.1); - ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FLAG_FILTER_TSYNC, + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog); ASSERT_EQ(0, ret); /* just us chickens */ } --2.8.0.rc3
-- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security