Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4) | linux-api

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Volker Lendecke
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:45:14AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions.  Any
model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake.
People can also learn and change though :-). One of the
biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the
incompatible ACL models.
Just to confirm: I see this a lot in the field. NFSv4 ACLs, while not a
perfect match for NTFS ACLs are a lot closer much more usable to people
who want to serve Windows clients.
Yes (and presumably Macs as well)

-- 
Thanks,

Steve

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)