Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Additional kmsg devices

Hello,

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:

quoted

Could you explain in more detail what did you mean by IPC problems?

I guess that the idea was to make IPC more effective in general.
You definitely could not move all functionality that needs IPC
into the kernel.

1. There are multiple ways to do IPC and I don't think what was
   implemented as the comparison is optimal.

2. If that were optimal, we have an a lot larger general IPC problem
   than logging.  We can't possibly implement custom solution for each
   specific IPC use case in kernel.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun