On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:18:05PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -770,7 +782,22 @@ void delayed_kthread_work_timer_fn(unsigned long __data)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!worker))
return;
- spin_lock(&worker->lock);
+ /*
+ * We might be unable to take the lock if someone is trying to
+ * cancel this work and calls del_timer_sync() when this callback
+ * has already been removed from the timer list.
+ */
+ while (!spin_trylock(&worker->lock)) {
+ /*
+ * Busy wait with spin_is_locked() to avoid cache bouncing.
+ * Break when canceling is set to avoid a deadlock.
+ */
+ do {
+ if (work->canceling)
+ return;
+ cpu_relax();
+ } while (spin_is_locked(&worker->lock));
+ }
/* Work must not be used with more workers, see queue_kthread_work(). */
WARN_ON_ONCE(work->worker != worker);
This is pretty vile; why can't you drop the lock over del_timer_sync() ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>