Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 5 authors, 2016-04-07

Re: [PATCH v1 10/10] efivars: use generic UUID library

From: Matt Fleming <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-18 15:07:35
Also in: dri-devel, linux-acpi, linux-efi, lkml, nvdimm

On Wed, 17 Feb, at 02:17:28PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Instead of opencoding let's use generic UUID library functions here.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 fs/efivarfs/inode.c | 40 +++-------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/efivarfs/inode.c b/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
index 3381b9d..b579e3a 100644
--- a/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/efivarfs/inode.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -44,11 +45,7 @@ struct inode *efivarfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
  */
 bool efivarfs_valid_name(const char *str, int len)
 {
-	static const char dashes[EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN] = {
-		[8] = 1, [13] = 1, [18] = 1, [23] = 1
-	};
 	const char *s = str + len - EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN;
-	int i;
 
 	/*
 	 * We need a GUID, plus at least one letter for the variable name,
@@ -66,37 +63,7 @@ bool efivarfs_valid_name(const char *str, int len)
 	 *
 	 *	12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN; i++) {
-		if (dashes[i]) {
-			if (*s++ != '-')
-				return false;
-		} else {
-			if (!isxdigit(*s++))
-				return false;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-static void efivarfs_hex_to_guid(const char *str, efi_guid_t *guid)
-{
-	guid->b[0] = hex_to_bin(str[6]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[7]);
-	guid->b[1] = hex_to_bin(str[4]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[5]);
-	guid->b[2] = hex_to_bin(str[2]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[3]);
-	guid->b[3] = hex_to_bin(str[0]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[1]);
-	guid->b[4] = hex_to_bin(str[11]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[12]);
-	guid->b[5] = hex_to_bin(str[9]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[10]);
-	guid->b[6] = hex_to_bin(str[16]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[17]);
-	guid->b[7] = hex_to_bin(str[14]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[15]);
-	guid->b[8] = hex_to_bin(str[19]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[20]);
-	guid->b[9] = hex_to_bin(str[21]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[22]);
-	guid->b[10] = hex_to_bin(str[24]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[25]);
-	guid->b[11] = hex_to_bin(str[26]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[27]);
-	guid->b[12] = hex_to_bin(str[28]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[29]);
-	guid->b[13] = hex_to_bin(str[30]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[31]);
-	guid->b[14] = hex_to_bin(str[32]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[33]);
-	guid->b[15] = hex_to_bin(str[34]) << 4 | hex_to_bin(str[35]);
+	return uuid_is_valid(s);
 }
I think you've confused yourself here. You've inverted the return
value meaning for efivarfs_valid_name().

Normally I would expect this change to be correct but uuid_is_valid()
returns 0 for success, -EINVAL for failure. Either the function is
misnamed or the return value semantics are wrong.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help