Hi Shuah,
On 4 February 2016 at 15:35, Shuah Khan [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/04/2016 07:04 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
quoted
[expanding the CC a little]
Hi Andy, (and Shuah)
On 4 February 2016 at 05:51, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[cc list heavily trimmed]
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Shuah Khan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Change dvb frontend to check if tuner is free when
device opened in RW mode. Call to enable_source
handler either returns with an active pipeline to
tuner or error if tuner is busy. Tuner is released
when frontend is released calling the disable_source
handler.
As an actual subscriber to linux-api, I prefer for the linux-api list
to be lowish-volume and mostly limited to API-related things. Is this
API related? Do people think that these series should be sent to
linux-api?
I think not, and I'd like to stem the flood of mail to the list.
There's two things that we could do:
I simply followed the getmaintainers generate3d list.
A bit surprised to see linux-api, but didn't want to
leave it out.
Yep -- you and many others. That's the problem with automated solutions ;-).
quoted
1. Shuah, I know we talked about this in the past, and it made some
sense to me at the time for kselftest to use linux-api@, but maybe
it's time to create a dedicated list, and move the traffic there? It'd
help focus the traffic of linux-api more on its original purpose.
Yes that is a good plan - I will request a new mailing list and
send in a patch to Kselftest MAINTIANER's entry.
Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. I guess a prominent mail onto
linux-api@ advertising the new list, once it has been created, would
not go amiss.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/