Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-01-31

Re: [RFC][PATCH] seccomp: add SECCOMP_RET_ACK for non-fatal SIGSYS

From: Jeffrey Vander Stoep <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-29 03:04:01
Also in: lkml

Thanks! This is just what I need.

What are the drawbacks to returning the sigsys before executing the
system call? Otherwise this loses the benefit of properly reporting
registers for argument inspection.

How about SECCOMP_RET_PERMISSIVE? Describes the application rather
than the implementation. Otherwise preference is for
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW_SIGSYS.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help