Emilio López [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/usbdevice_fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/usbdevice_fs.h
index 019ba1e..9abcb34 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/usbdevice_fs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/usbdevice_fs.h
@@ -154,6 +154,10 @@ struct usbdevfs_streams {
unsigned char eps[0];
};
+struct usbdevfs_drop_privs {
+ unsigned long interface_allowed_mask;
+};
+
"unsigned long" isn't a very good choice here, is it?
I went with a type matching ifclaimed on struct usb_dev_state to keep
the limit the same, but I guess it's not the best idea for an ioctl. I
can switch it to __u32, keeping the runtime check above as is, or use
__u64. Which one would you prefer?
I don't feel much like an expert here, but I can certainly make up an
opinion anyway :)
Since 64bits kernels allow usb devio with interface numbers up to 63, I
guess you need __u64 to avoid limiting the range? Limiting will create
all sorts of followup problems, so it's definitely easiest to just go
with __u64.
Bjørn