Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2015-12-08

Re: [PATCH v4] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks

From: Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-08 05:28:30
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:40:15PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:01:43PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
quoted
Create a new ioctl to expose the block layer's newfound ability to
issue either a zeroing discard, a WRITE SAME with a zero page, or a
regular write with the zero page.  This BLKZEROOUT2 ioctl takes
{start, length, flags} as parameters.  So far, the only flag available
is to enable the zeroing discard part -- without it, the call invokes
the old BLKZEROOUT behavior.  start and length have the same meaning
as in BLKZEROOUT.

Furthermore, because BLKZEROOUT2 issues commands directly to the
storage device, we must invalidate the page cache (as a regular
O_DIRECT write would do) to avoid returning stale cache contents at a
later time.
So does BLKZEROOUT.  Seems like adding the cache invalidation should
be one patch and the ioctl another one.  Otherwise this looks fine
except that I kinda hate BLKZEROOUT2 name, but can't come up with
anything better.
I should've sent the 4.4 version -- since the ioctl code was refactored into
separate functions and the new function modifies its arguments, I ended up
rewriting most of the function body just to set up the page cache invalidation.

(Ah, I see -- 4.4-rc1 came out and I forgot to resend.)

Blergh, v5 on its way...

--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help