Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: old_name.number scheme in livepatch sysfs directory
From: Josh Poimboeuf <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-03 15:03:10
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:44:41PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Also I would omit the suffix at all when it is the first occurrence. It will cause that unique symbols will not be numbered.
That would make parsing the entry unnecessarily harder and more error-prone. I think it should always have the suffix, so it's consistent and there are no surprises. -- Josh