Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 5 authors, 2015-10-06

Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls

From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2015-10-06 09:49:04
Also in: linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
quoted
Hello,

here's another update of the richacl patch queue.  At this stage, I would
like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
1-19) can be merged in the 4.4 merge window.  The nfsd and nfs code should
then go through the respective maintainer trees.
Now way in this form even if everyone agrees we should have these
bastard ACLs.  I certainly disagree.
Where is the rationale for them?

This url doesn't work: http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/





-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help