2015-09-23 16:03 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields [off-list ref]:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
quoted
+static int
+richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
+{
+ struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl;
+ unsigned int x = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
+ unsigned int other_mask = acl->a_other_mask & ~x;
+ struct richace *ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1;
+
+ if (!(other_mask &&
+ (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
+ (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED)))
+ return 0;
By the way, I think this is only called after checking MASKED--so the
MASKED check here could be a WARN_ON, or could just be dropped. Ditto
for the following patch.
Hmm, yes. I'll drop that.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html