On 2015.09.29 15:39:03 +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
- Logistically it might be more practical to contain this to the
graphics stack.
It seems fair to consider that if we can't see a very compelling
benefit to building on perf, then containing this work to
drivers/gpu/drm/i915 may simplify the review process as well as
future maintenance and development.
I think even we all initially like to go with perf but it appears later
that we might need to stick this more close with i915 driver. Also think
about to enable global profiling for all graphics clients, extending or
enabling it within i915 specific interface seems more feasible instead of
trying to create another PMU driver like previous implementation attempt
to suit the need for different gfx perf data definition.
Robert, thanks for send and elaborate on this.
--
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.
$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827