Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/anon_inodes: new interface to create new inode
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-29 10:50:03
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:35:16PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
From: Gioh Kim <redacted> The anon_inodes has already complete interfaces to create manage many anonymous inodes but don't have interface to get new inode. Other sub-modules can create anonymous inode without creating and mounting it's own pseudo filesystem. Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <redacted> Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <redacted>
This is my first run through the series so I'm going to miss details but this patch confuses me a little. You create an inode to associate with the balloon dev_info so that page->mapping can be assigned. It's only the mapping you care about for the aops so why are multiple inodes required? A driver should be able to share and reference count a single inode. The motivation to do it that way would be to reduce memory consumption and this series is motivated by embedded platforms. anon_inode_getfd has the following * Creates a new file by hooking it on a single inode. This is useful for files * that do not need to have a full-fledged inode in order to operate correctly. * All the files created with anon_inode_getfd() will share a single inode, * hence saving memory and avoiding code duplication for the file/inode/dentry * setup. Returns new descriptor or an error code. If all we care about the inode is the aops then it would follow that anon_inode_getfd() is ideal. The tradeoff is reference counting overhead. The changelog needs to explain why anon_inode_getfd() cannot be used. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>