Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2015-07-06

Re: [GIT PULL] User namespace related fixes for v4.2

From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-06 21:24:09
Also in: linux-fsdevel


On July 6, 2015 3:47:48 PM CDT, Seth Forshee [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:41:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted
This set of changes also starts enforcing the mount flags of fresh
mounts of proc and sysfs are consistent with the existing mount of
proc
quoted
and sysfs.  I expected this to be the boring part of the work but
unfortunately unprivileged userspace winds up mounting fresh copies
of
quoted
proc and sysfs with noexec and nosuid clear when root set those flags
on
quoted
the previous mount of proc and sysfs.  So for now only the atime,
read-only and nodev attributes which userspace happens to keep
consistent are enforced.  Dealing with the noexec and nosuid
attributes
quoted
remains for another time.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I am seeing a regression in lxc
with 4.2-rc1 due to this change. lxc is doing a fresh mount of sysfs
that never specifies either read-only or nodev regardless of how sysfs
has been mounted previously, and this is causing me to see mount
failures because of the nodev check.

If I comment out only the nodev check then the mount works on my
system,
but based on the code in lxc I don't think there's any guarantee at all
of this mount having flags consistent with previous mounts.
Seth you are testing your inprogress patchset that
modifies how nodev works aren't you?

In rc1 nodev is always forced on a mount in a user namespace.

There is a fairly easy fix to the nodev cleanup in your
patchset, but it takes a few lines of code change in
fs_fully_visible.  Essentially after we get the better
nodev enforcement, fs_fully_visible does not need
to bother with nodev.

Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help