Hi Srinivas,
Am Freitag, den 10.07.2015, 10:44 +0100 schrieb Srinivas Kandagatla:
This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy
review.
[...]
+/**
+ * nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
+ * Also creates an binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
+ *
+ * @config: nvmem device configuration with which nvmem device is created.
+ *
+ * The return value will be an ERR_PTR() on error or a valid pointer
+ * to nvmem_device.
+ */
+
+struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(struct nvmem_config *config)
+{
[...]
+ nvmem->read_only = nvmem->dev.of_node ?
+ of_property_read_bool(nvmem->dev.of_node,
+ "read-only") :
+ config->read_only;
I think read_only should be set if any of the device node property or
nvmem_config->read_only request it. That way, even if the nvmem is
theoretically writeable (no read-only property in DT), the driver still
can make it read-only if writing isn't implemented:
+ nvmem->read_only = nvmem->dev.of_node ?
+ of_property_read_bool(nvmem->dev.of_node,
+ "read-only") : 0;
+ nvmem->read_only |= config->read_only;
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f589d3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
[...]
+struct nvmem_config {
+ struct device *dev;
+ const char *name;
+ int id;
+ struct module *owner;
+ struct nvmem_cell_info *cells;
Should that be const?
+ int ncells;
+ bool read_only;
+};
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM)
+
+struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(struct nvmem_config *cfg);
Then that could be made const, too.
best regards
Philipp