Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 0/3] Allow user to request memory to be locked on page fault
From: Eric B Munson <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-11 19:21:55
Also in:
linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-mips, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/2015 05:59 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:26:47 -0400 Eric B Munson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it iss/mapping/locked area/
Done.
quoted
allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. This series introduces new flags for mmap() and mlockall() that allow a user to specify that the covered are should not be paged out, but only after the memory has been used the first time.The comparison with MCL_FUTURE is hiding over in the 2/3 changelog. It's important so let's copy it here. : MCL_ONFAULT is preferrable to MCL_FUTURE for the use cases enumerated : in the previous patch becuase MCL_FUTURE will behave as if each mapping : was made with MAP_LOCKED, causing the entire mapping to be faulted in : when new space is allocated or mapped. MCL_ONFAULT allows the user to : delay the fault in cost of any given page until it is actually needed, : but then guarantees that that page will always be resident.
Done
I *think* it all looks OK. I'd like someone else to go over it also if poss. I guess the 2/3 changelog should have something like : munlockall() will clear MCL_ONFAULT on all vma's in the process's VM.
Done
It's pretty obvious, but the manpage delta should make this clear also.
Done
Also the changelog(s) and manpage delta should explain that munlock() clears MCL_ONFAULT.
Done
And now I'm wondering what happens if userspace does mmap(MAP_LOCKONFAULT) and later does munlock() on just part of that region. Does the vma get split? Is this tested? Should also be in the changelogs and manpage. Ditto mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) followed by munlock(). I'm not sure that even makes sense but the behaviour should be understood and tested.
I have extended the kselftest for lock-on-fault to try both of these scenarios and they work as expected. The VMA is split and the VM flags are set appropriately for the resulting VMAs.
What's missing here is a syscall to set VM_LOCKONFAULT on an arbitrary range of memory - mlock() for lock-on-fault. It's a shame that mlock() didn't take a `mode' argument. Perhaps we should add such a syscall - that would make the mmap flag unneeded but I suppose it should be kept for symmetry.
Do you want such a system call as part of this set? I would need some time to make sure I had thought through all the possible corners one could get into with such a call, so it would delay a V3 quite a bit. Otherwise I can send a V3 out immediately. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVed+3AAoJELbVsDOpoOa9eHwP+gO8QmNdUKN55wiTLxXdFTRo TTm62MJ3Yk45+JJ+8xI1POMSUVEBAX7pxnL8TpNPmwp+UF6IQT/hAnnEFNud8/aQ 5bAxU9a5fRO6Q5533woaVpYfXZXwXAla+37MGQziL7O0VEi2aQ9abX7AKnkjmXwq e1Fc3vutAycNCzSxg42GwZxqHw83TYztyv3C4Cc7lShbCezABYvaDvXcUZkGwhjG KJxSPYS2E0nv0MEy995P0L0H1A/KHq6mCOFFKQw6aVbPDs8J/0RhvQIlp/BBCPMV TqDVxMBpTpdWs6reJnUZpouKBTA11KTvUA2HBVn5B14u2V7Np+NBpLKH2DUqAP2v Gyg4Nj0MknqB1rutaBjHjI0ZefrWK5o+zWAVKZs+wtq9WkmCvTYWp505XnlJO+qo 1CEnab2kX8P74UYcsJUrJxAtxc94t6oLh305KnJheQUdcx/ZNKboB2vl1+np10jj oZLmP2RfajZoPojPZ/bI6mj9Ffqf/Ptau+kLQ56G1IuVmQRi4ZgQ9D1+BILXyKHi uycKovcHVffiQ+z1Ama2b4wP1t5yjNdxBH0oV1KMeScCxfyYHPFuDBe36Krjo8FO dDMyibNIRJMX6SeYNIRni40Eafon5h21I95/yWxUaq0FGBZ1NuuSTofxAA53wJJz f0FUI7f53Oxk9EKk8nfg =gfVJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>