Re: [PATCH] seccomp: add ptrace commands for suspend/resume
From: Tycho Andersen <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-03 16:58:13
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 06:54:51PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 06/03, Tycho Andersen wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 08:48:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:quoted
Otherwise, if we use PTRACE_O_ instead, it goes away automatically if the tracer dies or does PTRACE_DETACH.IIRC the flag goes away, but we still have to do something in __ptrace_unlink to clear the seccomp suspended, so I'm not sure if the automatic-ness helps us.But we do not need seccomp->suspended at all? Unless I missed something PTRACE_O_ needs a one-liner patch (ignoring the defines in include files),--- x/kernel/seccomp.c +++ x/kernel/seccomp.c@@ -692,6 +692,9 @@ u32 seccomp_phase1(struct seccomp_data * int this_syscall = sd ? sd->nr : syscall_get_nr(current, task_pt_regs(current)); + if (unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_NAME_OF_THIS_OPTION)) + return OK; + switch (mode) { case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT: __secure_computing_strict(this_syscall); /* may call do_exit */OK, and the same check in secure_computing_strict(). No?
I see, I misunderstood. Yes, this is a lot nicer, thank you. Tycho