(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2) · Kenton Varda <hidden> · 2015-05-28
Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2) · Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> · 2015-05-28
Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2) · Kenton Varda <hidden> · 2015-05-28

Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)

From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date: 2015-05-28 20:47:36
Also in: linux-fsdevel

Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kenton Varda:

We never mount sysfs in Sandstorm.

sysfs is ABI and applications depend on it.
Even glibc is using sysfs. Currently it has
fallback paths but these may go away...

Thanks,
//richard