Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 4 authors, 2015-03-14

Re: [PATCH 6/6] clone4: Introduce new CLONE_FD flag to get task exit notification via fd

From: Oleg Nesterov <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-14 14:14:14
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On 03/13, josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:21:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted
Again, I simply do not know what this code does at all. But I bet the usage
of EXIT_DEAD is wrong ;)

OK, OK, I can be wrong. But I simply do not see what protects this task_struct
if it is EXIT_DEAD (in fact even if it is EXIT_ZOMBIE).
If by "what protects" you mean "what keeps it alive", the file
descriptor holds a reference to the task_struct by calling
get_task_struct when created and put_task_struct when released.
OK, so I was wrong. Although I still have a gut feeling that the usage
of EXIT_DEAD can't be right. Because it was always wrong outside of core
"exit" code ;) Nevermind, I didn't read this series yet, forget.
quoted
quoted
@@ -598,7 +600,9 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, int group_dead)
 	if (group_dead)
 		kill_orphaned_pgrp(tsk->group_leader, NULL);

-	if (unlikely(tsk->ptrace)) {
+	if (tsk->autoreap) {
+		autoreap = true;
Debuggers won't be happy. A ptraced task should not autoreap itself.
A process launching a new process with CLONE_FD is explicitly requesting
that the process be automatically reaped without any other process
having to wait on it.  The task needs to not become a zombie, because
otherwise, it'll show up in waitpid(-1, ...)
This is clear.

But please note that this task can be traced/debugged by unrelated process,
not its real_parent/creator. Say, the system admin does "strace -p". This
simply breaks the current API.

Again, again, I didn't read this series yet. But the proper solution (afaics)
should move this "autoreap" check in release_task/__ptrace_detach(). If the
task is traced. Debugger should check ->autoreap and skip another
do_notify_parent().


Speaking of autoreap... If ->exit_signal is zero, then the exiting child
doesn't send the notification to its parent, still it doesn't autoreap
itself. To me this looks strange, and in fact it seems to me that this
is only by mistake. I am wondering if we can treat ->exit_signal == 0
as "autoreap" too. As usual, most probably the answer is "no, because it
is too late to change the historical behaviour". But this is off-topic.

Oleg.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help