On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:22:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 22:08:26 -0700 Shaohua Li [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Daniel also had microbenchmark testing results for glibc and jemalloc.
Can you please do this?
I run Daniel's microbenchmark too, and not surprise the result is
similar:
glibc: 32.82
jemalloc: 70.35
jemalloc+mremap: 33.01
tcmalloc: 68.81
but tcmalloc doesn't support mremap currently, so I cant test it.
But Daniel's changelog implies strongly that tcmalloc would benefit
from his patch. Was that inaccurate or is this a difference between
his patch and yours?
There is no big difference, except I fixed some issues. Daniel didn't
post data for tcmalloc, I suppose it's potential mremap can make
tcmalloc faster too, but Daniel can clarify.
Thanks,
Shaohua