Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 5 authors, 2015-05-06

Re: [PATCH 5/5] kselftest: Add exit code defines

From: Darren Hart <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-27 23:09:28
Also in: lkml


On 3/27/15 3:59 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 15:17 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
quoted
Define the exit codes with KSFT_PASS and similar so tests can use these
directly if they choose. Also enable harnesses and other tooling to use
the defines instead of hardcoding the return codes.
 
+1
quoted
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
index 572c888..ef1c80d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
@@ -13,6 +13,13 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 
+/* define kselftest exit codes */
+#define KSFT_PASS  0
+#define KSFT_FAIL  1
+#define KSFT_XFAIL 2
+#define KSFT_XPASS 3
+#define KSFT_SKIP  4
+
 /* counters */
 struct ksft_count {
 	unsigned int ksft_pass;
@@ -40,23 +47,23 @@ static inline void ksft_print_cnts(void)
 
 static inline int ksft_exit_pass(void)
 {
-	exit(0);
+	exit(KSFT_PASS);
 }
Am I the only person who's bothered by the fact that these don't actually
return int?
That bothered me to, but I couldn't be bothered to go read the manuals
apparently to come up with a compelling argument :-)

I also think the ksft_exit* routines should go ahead and increment the
counters (at least optionally) so we don't have to call two functions.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help