Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2015-02-27

Re: Documenting MS_LAZYTIME

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2015-02-27 00:04:15
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-man, linux-xfs

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
    The disadvantage of MS_STRICTATIME | MS_LAZYTIME is that
    in the case of a system crash, the atime and mtime fields
    on disk might be out of date by at most 24 hours.
I'd change to "The disadvantage of MS_LAZYTIME is that..."  and
perhaps move that so it's clear it applies to any use of MS_LAZYTIME
has this as a downside.

Does that make sense?

						- Ted
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help