Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: fix suspend/resume paths for TPM 2.0
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-27 16:57:31
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 16:52 +0000, Scot Doyle wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:quoted
Fixed suspend/resume paths for TPM 2.0 and consolidated all the associated code to the tpm_pm_suspend() and tpm_pm_resume() functions. Resume path should be handled by the firmware, i.e. Startup(CLEAR) for hibernate and Startup(STATE) for suspend. There might be some non-PC embedded devices in the future where Startup() is not the handled by the FW but fixing the code for those IMHO should be postponed until there is hardware available to test the fixes although extra Startup in the driver code is essentially a NOP. Reported-by: Peter Hüwe <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> ---...quoted
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c@@ -865,25 +865,23 @@ static void tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip) static int tpm_tis_resume(struct device *dev) {...quoted
+ /* TPM 1.2 requires self-test on resume. */ + if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) { + ret = tpm_do_selftest(chip); + if (ret < 0) + return ret;Just to note, the return value from tpm_do_selftest() on TPM 1.2 chips was previously ignored. Mine does return 0.
Right. I can update the patch to ignore return value if the majority wants that. /Jarkko